Bill
Public Employee Gender-specific Language Requirements
- Number
- H.B. 250 (2025GS)
- Sponsor
- Rep. Peck, Nicholeen P.
- Final action
- House/ filed 3/7/2025
- Outcome
- Failed / filed without passage
Summary
This bill prohibits certain employment action against a public employee in relation to gender-specific language.
What it does
- This bill:
- prohibits the State Board of Education, a local education agency, or a public employer from taking disciplinary action against an employee for using gender-specific language in certain circumstances;
- requires a public employer that has a rule or policy requiring an employee to use gender-specific language to accommodate another individual to exempt the employee from disciplinary action in certain circumstances; and
- makes technical changes.
Every vote on this bill
2/13/2025House Comm - Amendment Recommendation
House Education Committee
13-0-3not eligible / no record2/13/2025House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Education Committee
12-1-3not eligible / no record2/21/2025House/ substituted
House 3rd Reading Calendar for House bills
0-0-75not eligible / no record2/21/2025House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
51-13-11YEA3/4/2025Senate Comm - Motion to Recommend Failed
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
2-3-2not eligible / no recordBill text
introduced version · official source
6 53G-10-206 67-21-3.3 Public Employee Gender-specific Language Requirements 2025 GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Nicholeen P. Peck Senate Sponsor: Daniel McCay LONG TITLE General Description: This bill prohibits certain employment action against a public employee. Highlighted Provisions: This bill: prohibits the State Board of Education, a local education agency, or a public employer from taking disciplinary action against an employee for using gender-specific language in certain circumstances; requires a public employer that has a rule or policy requiring an employee to use gender-specific language to accommodate another individual to exempt the employee from disciplinary action in certain circumstances; and makes technical changes. Money Appropriated in this Bill: None Other Special Clauses: This bill provides a special effective date. Utah Code Sections Affected: AMENDS: 53G-10-206 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 507 ENACTS: 67-21-3.3 , Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: Section 1, Section 53G-10-206 is amended to read: 53G-10-206. Educational freedom. (1) As used in this section: (a) (i) "Administrative personnel" means any LEA or state board staff personnel who have system-wide, LEA-wide, or school-wide functions and who perform management activities, including: (A) developing broad policies for LEA or state-level boards; and (B) executing developed policies through the direction of personnel at any level within the state or LEA. (ii) "Administrative personnel" includes state, LEA, or school superintendents, assistant superintendents, deputy superintendents, school principals, assistant principals, directors, executive directors, network directors, cabinet members, subject area directors, grant coordinators, specialty directors, career center directors, educational specialists, technology personnel, technology administrators, and others who perform management activities. (b) (i) "Instructional personnel" means an individual whose function includes the provision of: (A) direct or indirect instructional services to students; (B) direct or indirect support in the learning process of students; or (C) direct or indirect delivery of instruction, training, coaching, evaluation, or professional development to instructional or administrative personnel. (ii) "Instructional personnel" includes: (A) the state board, LEAs, schools, superintendents, boards, administrators, administrative staff, teachers, classroom teachers, facilitators, coaches, proctors, therapists, counselors, student personnel services, librarians, media specialists, associations, affiliations, committees, contractors, vendors, consultants, advisors, outside entities, community volunteers, para-professionals, public-private partners, trainers, mentors, specialists, and staff; or (B) any other employees, officials, government agencies, educational entities, persons, or groups for whom access to students is facilitated through, or not feasible without, the public education system. (2) (a) Each LEA shall provide an annual assurance to the state board that the LEA's professional learning, administrative functions, displays, and instructional and curricular materials, are consistent with the following principles of individual freedom: (i) the principle that all individuals are equal before the law and have unalienable rights; and (ii) the following principles of individual freedom: (A) that no individual is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously, solely by virtue of the individual's race, sex, or sexual orientation; (B) that no race is inherently superior or inferior to another race; (C) that no person should be subject to discrimination or adverse treatment solely or partly on the basis of the individual's race, color, national origin, religion, disability, sex, or sexual orientation; (D) that meritocracy or character traits, including hard work ethic, are not racist nor associated with or inconsistent with any racial or ethnic group; and (E) that an individual, by virtue of the individual's race or sex, does not bear responsibility for actions that other members of the same race or sex committed in the past or present. (b) Nothing in this section prohibits instruction regarding race, color, national origin, religion, disability, or sex in a manner that is consistent with the principles described in Subsection (2)(a). (3) The state board or an LEA may not: (a) attempt to persuade a student or instructional or administrative personnel to a point of view that is inconsistent with the principles described in Subsection (2)(a); or (b) implement policies or programs, or allow instructional personnel or administrative personnel to implement policies or programs, with content that is inconsistent with the principles described in Subsection (2)(a) . ; or (c) pursue disciplinary action against an individual who is instructional personnel or administrative personnel solely because the individual, in relation to a student, referred to the student by: (i) in good faith, the student's birth name, biological gender, or a pronoun or other gender-specific language related to the student's biological gender; or (ii) the name, pronoun, or gender-specific language the student's parent prefers. (4) The state board and state superintendent may not develop or continue to use core standards under Section 53E-3-301 or professional learning that are inconsistent with the principles described in Subsection (2)(a). Section 2, Section 67-21-3.3 is enacted to read: 67-21-3.3. Gender-specific language preference -- Employer action. (1) An employer may not pursue disciplinary action against an employee solely because the employee: (a) in good faith, uses a pronoun or other gender-specific language in relation to another individual that conflicts with the individual's personal gender-specific language preference; or (b) because of the employee's sincerely held religious or moral belief, uses a pronoun or other gender-specific language in relation to another individual that conflicts with the individual's personal gender-specific language preference. (2) If an employer implements a rule or policy that requires an employee to use gender-specific language to accommodate another individual's personal gender-specific language preference, the employer shall: (a) ensure that the rule or policy exempts from disciplinary action an employee described in Subsection (1) ; and (b) notify employees in writing of the exemptions described in this section. Section 3. Effective Date. This bill takes effect on July 1, 2025 . 1-16-25 3:03 PM