Bill
Greenbelt Property Amendments
- Number
- H.B. 257 First Substitute (2023GS)
- Sponsor
- Rep. Kyle, J
- Final action
- House/ to Governor 3/13/2023
- Outcome
- House/ to Governor
Summary
This bill modifies provisions of the Utah Farmland Assessment Act.
What it does
- This bill:
- requires a county or commission to waive the acreage requirement for agricultural assessment if the assessed property fails to meet the acreage requirement because of a governmental entity exercising eminent domain or threatening eminent domain; and
- makes technical and conforming changes.
Every vote on this bill
1/30/2023House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee
10 0 4not eligible / no record2/3/2023House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
72 0 3YEA2/10/2023Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
5 0 3not eligible / no record2/15/2023Senate/ passed 2nd reading
Senate 3rd Reading Calendar
24 0 5not eligible / no record2/16/2023Senate/ circled
Senate 3rd Reading Calendar
Voice votenot eligible / no record2/17/2023Senate/ uncircled
Senate 3rd Reading Calendar
Voice votenot eligible / no record2/17/2023Senate/ substituted from # 0 to # 1
Senate 3rd Reading Calendar
Voice votenot eligible / no record2/17/2023Senate/ passed 3rd reading
Clerk of the House
24 0 5not eligible / no record2/21/2023House/ concurs with Senate amendment
Senate President
67 0 8YEABill text
introduced version · official source
GREENBELT PROPERTY AMENDMENTS GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Jason Kyle Senate Sponsor: Ronald M. Winterton LONG TITLE General Description: This bill modifies provisions of the Utah Farmland Assessment Act. Highlighted Provisions: This bill: ▸ requires a county or commission to waive the acreage requirement for agricultural assessment if the assessed property fails to meet the acreage requirement because of a governmental entity exercising eminent domain or threatening eminent domain; and ▸ makes technical and conforming changes. Money Appropriated in this Bill: None Other Special Clauses: None Utah Code Sections Affected: AMENDS: 59-2-503 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2013, Chapter 322 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: Section 1. Section 59-2-503 is amended to read: 59-2-503. Qualifications for agricultural use assessment. (1) For general property tax purposes, land may be assessed on the basis of the value that the land has for agricultural use if the land: (a) is not less than five contiguous acres in area, except that land may be assessed on the basis of the value that the land has for agricultural use: (i) if: (A) the land is devoted to agricultural use in conjunction with other eligible acreage; and (B) the land and the other eligible acreage described in Subsection (1)(a)(i)(A) have identical legal ownership; or (ii) as provided under [ Subsection (4) ] Subsections (4) and (5) ; and (b) except as provided in Subsection [ (5) ] or [ (6) ] : (i) is actively devoted to agricultural use; and (ii) has been actively devoted to agricultural use for at least two successive years immediately preceding the tax year for which the land is being assessed under this part. (2) In determining whether land is actively devoted to agricultural use, production per acre for a given county or area and a given type of land shall be determined by using the first applicable of the following: (a) production levels reported in the current publication of the Utah Agricultural Statistics; (b) current crop budgets developed and published by Utah State University; and (c) other acceptable standards of agricultural production designated by the commission by rule adopted in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act. (3) Land may be assessed on the basis of the land's agricultural value if the land: (a) is subject to the privilege tax imposed by Section 59-4-101 ; (b) is owned by the state or any of the state's political subdivisions; and (c) meets the requirements of Subsection (1). (4) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), the commission or a county board of equalization may grant a waiver of the acreage limitation for land upon: (a) appeal by the owner; and (b) submission of proof that[ : (i) ] 80% or more of the owner's, purchaser's, or lessee's income is derived from agricultural products produced on the property in question[ ; or ] . [ (ii) (A) the failure to meet the acreage requirement arose solely as a result of an acquisition by a governmental entity by: ] [ (I) eminent domain; or ] [ (II) the threat or imminence of an eminent domain proceeding; ] [ (B) the land is actively devoted to agricultural use; and ] [ (C) no change occurs in the ownership of the land. ] (5) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), the commission or a county board of equalization shall grant a waiver of the acreage limitation for land upon: (a) appeal by the owner; and (b) submission of proof that: (i) the failure to meet the acreage requirement arose solely as a result of an acquisition by a governmental entity by: (A) eminent domain; or (B) the threat or imminence of an eminent domain proceeding; and (ii) the land is actively devoted to agricultural use. [ (5) ] (6) (a) The commission or a county board of equalization may grant a waiver of the requirement that the land is actively devoted to agricultural use for the tax year for which the land is being assessed under this part upon: (i) appeal by the owner; and (ii) submission of proof that: (A) the land was assessed on the basis of agricultural use for at least two years immediately preceding that tax year; and (B) the failure to meet the agricultural production requirements for that tax year was due to no fault or act of the owner, purchaser, or lessee. (b) As used in Subsection [ (5)(a) ] (6)(a) , "fault" does not include: (i) intentional planting of crops or trees which, because of the maturation period, do not give the owner, purchaser, or lessee a reasonable opportunity to satisfy the production levels required for land actively devoted to agricultural use; or (ii) implementation of a bona fide range improvement program, crop rotation program, or other similar accepted cultural practices which do not give the owner, purchaser, or lessee a reasonable opportunity to satisfy the production levels required for land actively devoted to agricultural use. [ (6) ] (7) Land that otherwise qualifies for assessment under this part qualifies for assessment under this part in the first year the land resumes being actively devoted to agricultural use if: (a) the land becomes ineligible for assessment under this part only as a result of a split estate mineral rights owner exercising the right to extract a mineral; and (b) the land qualified for assessment under this part in the year immediately preceding the year the land became ineligible for assessment under this part only as a result of a split estate mineral rights owner exercising the right to extract a mineral. [ (7) ] (8) Land that otherwise qualifies under Subsection (1) to be assessed on the basis of the value that the land has for agricultural use does not lose that qualification by becoming subject to a forest stewardship plan developed under Section 65A-8a-106 under which the land is subject to a temporary period of limited use or nonuse.