Rep. Norm Thurston — Voting Record

Utah House District 62 · complete roll-call record from le.utah.gov
← All votes

Bill

Procurement Code Revisions
Number
S.B. 188 Second Substitute (2021GS)
Sponsor
Sen. Owens, D.R.
Final action
Governor Signed 3/22/2021
Outcome
Became law — signed by Gov. Spencer J. Cox

Summary

This bill modifies provisions of the Utah Procurement Code.

What it does

  • This bill:
  • modifies a provision relating to a procurement unit's evaluation of bids;
  • provides that a procurement intended for the establishment of a state liquor store may be made without engaging in a standard procurement process;
  • defines "contract price" in the context of a provision allowing a contractor to increase or lower the contract price; and
  • prohibits a contractor under a multiple award contract from lowering the contract price under certain circumstances.

Every vote on this bill

2/18/2021Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation from # 0 to # 1
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
5 0 3not eligible / no record
2/18/2021Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
7 0 1not eligible / no record
2/19/2021Senate/ passed 2nd reading
Senate 3rd Reading Calendar
19 0 10not eligible / no record
2/22/2021Senate/ passed 3rd reading
Clerk of the House
24 0 5not eligible / no record
3/4/2021House/ circled
House 3rd Reading Calendar for Senate bills
Voice votenot eligible / no record
3/4/2021House/ uncircled
House 3rd Reading Calendar for Senate bills
Voice votenot eligible / no record
3/4/2021House/ substituted from # 1 to # 2
House 3rd Reading Calendar for Senate bills
Voice votenot eligible / no record
3/4/2021House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
64 6 5YEA
3/4/2021Senate/ concurs with House amendment
House Speaker
26 0 3not eligible / no record

Bill text

enrolled version · official source
PROCUREMENT CODE REVISIONS
GENERAL SESSION
STATE OF UTAH
Chief Sponsor: Derrin R. Owens
House Sponsor: 
Kay J. Christofferson
LONG TITLE
General Description:
This bill modifies provisions of the Utah Procurement Code.
Highlighted Provisions:
This bill:
▸ modifies a provision relating to a procurement unit's evaluation of bids;
▸ provides that a procurement intended for the establishment of a state liquor store
may be made without engaging in a standard procurement process;
▸ defines "contract price" in the context of a provision allowing a contractor to
increase or lower the contract price; and
▸ prohibits a contractor under a multiple award contract from lowering the contract
price under certain circumstances.
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
None
Other Special Clauses:
None
Utah Code Sections Affected:
AMENDS:
63G-6a-606
, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2020, Chapter 257
63G-6a-802
, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2020, Chapters 257 and 286
63G-6a-1206.5
, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 355
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 1. Section 
63G-6a-606
 is amended to read:
63G-6a-606.
Evaluation of bids -- Award -- Cancellation.
(1) A procurement unit that conducts a procurement using a bidding process shall
evaluate [
each bid
] 
bids:
(a)
 using the objective criteria described in the invitation for bids[
.
]
; and
(b) to achieve the greatest long-term value to the state and the procurement unit.
(2) Criteria not described in the invitation for bids may not be used to evaluate a bid.
(3) After evaluating bids, the procurement unit shall:
(a) (i) award a contract as soon as practicable to the responsible bidder who submits the
lowest responsive bid; and
(ii) publish the name and bid amount of the bidder to whom the contract is awarded; or
(b) (i) cancel the invitation for bids without awarding a contract; and
(ii) publish a notice of the cancellation that includes an explanation of the reasons for
cancelling the invitation for bids.
Section 2. Section 
63G-6a-802
 is amended to read:
63G-6a-802.
Award of contract without engaging in a standard procurement
process -- Notice -- Duty to negotiate contract terms in best interest of procurement unit.
(1) A procurement unit may award a contract for a procurement item without engaging
in a standard procurement process if the procurement official determines in writing that:
(a) there is only one source for the procurement item;
(b) (i) transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item;
and
(ii) the results of a cost-benefit analysis demonstrate that transitional costs are
unreasonable or cost-prohibitive, and that the award of a contract without engaging in a
standard procurement process is in the best interest of the procurement unit; [
or
]
(c) the award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the
rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process
impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit[
.
]
; or
(d) the procurement item is intended to be used for, or in connection with the
establishment of, a state store, as defined in Section 
32B-1-102
.
(2) Transitional costs associated with a trial use or testing of a procurement item under
a trial use contract awarded under Section 
63G-6a-802.3
 may not be included in a
consideration of transitional costs under Subsection (1)(b).
(3) (a) Subject to Subsection (3)(b), a rulemaking authority shall make rules regarding
the publication of notice for a procurement under this section that, at a minimum, require
publication of notice of the procurement, in accordance with Section 
63G-6a-112
, if the cost of
the procurement exceeds $50,000.
(b) Publication of notice under Section 
63G-6a-112
 is not required for:
(i) the procurement of public utility services pursuant to a sole source contract; or
(ii) other procurements under this section for which an applicable rule provides that
notice is not required.
(4) A procurement official who awards a contract under this section shall negotiate
with the contractor to ensure that the terms of the contract, including price and delivery, are in
the best interest of the procurement unit.
Section 3. Section 
63G-6a-1206.5
 is amended to read:
63G-6a-1206.5.
Change in contract price.
(1) As used in this section, "contract price":
(a) means the price under an existing contract between a procurement unit and a
contractor; and
(b) does not include a proposed price or cost contained in a solicitation response or any
other bid, proposal, or offer submitted by a person other than the contractor under the existing
contract.
(2)
 A contractor may:
[
(1)
] 
(a)
 increase the contract price only in accordance with the terms of the contract;
and
[
(2)
] 
(b) subject to Subsection (3),
 lower the contract price at any time during the time
a contract is in effect.
(3) A contractor under a multiple award contract resulting from a bidding process may
not lower the contract price unless the contractor's solicitation response that led to the contract
award was the lowest price solicitation response.