Bill
Career Service Review Office Amendments
- Number
- H.B. 183 (2018GS)
- Sponsor
- Rep. Christensen, L.
- Final action
- Governor Signed 3/16/2018
- Outcome
- Became law — signed by Gov. Gary R. Herbert
Summary
This bill repeals a requirement that the Career Service Review Office employ a court reporter to make a transcript of a grievance procedure hearing.
What it does
- This bill:
- repeals a requirement that the administrator of the Career Service Review Office employ a court reporter to make a transcript of a grievance procedure hearing; and
- requires the administrator of the Career Service Review Office to record a grievance procedure hearing.
Every vote on this bill
1/31/2018House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Judiciary Committee
12 0 0not eligible / no record1/31/2018House Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
House Judiciary Committee
12 0 0not eligible / no record2/5/2018House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
68 0 7YEA2/12/2018Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee
4 0 3not eligible / no record2/12/2018Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee
4 0 3not eligible / no record2/16/2018Senate/ passed 3rd reading
Senate President
24 0 5not eligible / no recordBill text
enrolled version · official source
CAREER SERVICE REVIEW OFFICE AMENDMENTS GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: LaVar Christensen Senate Sponsor: Brian Zehnder LONG TITLE General Description: This bill repeals a requirement that the Career Service Review Office employ a court reporter to make a transcript of a grievance procedure hearing. Highlighted Provisions: This bill: ▸ repeals a requirement that the administrator of the Career Service Review Office employ a court reporter to make a transcript of a grievance procedure hearing; and ▸ requires the administrator of the Career Service Review Office to record a grievance procedure hearing. Money Appropriated in this Bill: None Other Special Clauses: None Utah Code Sections Affected: AMENDS: 67-19a-406 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2013, Chapter 109 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: Section 1. Section 67-19a-406 is amended to read: 67-19a-406. Procedural steps to be followed by aggrieved employee -- Hearing before hearing officer -- Evidentiary and procedural rules. (1) (a) The administrator shall [ employ a certified court reporter to ] record the hearing and [ prepare an official transcript of the hearing ] preserve the record . (b) The [ official transcript ] recording of the proceedings and all exhibits, briefs, motions, and pleadings received by the hearing officer are the official record of the proceeding. (2) (a) The agency has the burden of proof in all grievances. (b) The agency must prove the agency's case by substantial evidence. (3) (a) The hearing officer shall issue a written decision within 20 working days after the hearing is adjourned. (b) If the hearing officer does not issue a decision within 20 working days, the agency that is a party to the grievance is not liable for any claimed back wages or benefits after the date the decision is due. (4) The hearing officer may: (a) not award attorney fees or costs to either party; (b) close a hearing by complying with the procedures and requirements of Title 52, Chapter 4, Open and Public Meetings Act; (c) seal the file and the evidence produced at the hearing if the evidence raises questions about an employee's character, professional competence, or physical or mental health; (d) grant continuances according to rule; and (e) decide a motion, an issue regarding discovery, or another issue in accordance with this chapter. (5) (a) A hearing officer shall affirm, rescind, or modify agency action. (b) (i) If a hearing officer does not affirm agency action, the hearing officer shall order back pay and back benefits that the grievant would have received without the agency action. (ii) An order under Subsection (5)(b)(i) shall include: (A) reimbursement to the grievant for premiums that the grievant paid for benefits allowed under the Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985; and (B) an offset for any state paid benefits the grievant receives because of the agency action, including unemployment compensation benefits. (c) In an order under Subsection (5)(b)(i), a hearing officer may not reduce the amount of back pay and benefits awarded a grievant because of income that the grievant earns during the grievance process.