Rep. Norm Thurston — Voting Record

Utah House District 62 · complete roll-call record from le.utah.gov
← All votes

Bill

Impact Fee Amendments
Number
H.B. 279 (2017GS)
Sponsor
Rep. Brooks, W.
Final action
Governor Signed 3/21/2017
Outcome
Became law — signed by Gov. Gary R. Herbert

Summary

This bill modifies provisions relating to impact fees.

What it does

  • This bill:
  • modifies a provision relating to spending or encumbering impact fees; and
  • provides a process for a refund of unspent and unencumbered impact fees.

Every vote on this bill

2/15/2017House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Business and Labor Committee
8 0 6not eligible / no record
2/27/2017House/ floor amendment # 1
House 3rd Reading Calendar for House bills
Voice votenot eligible / no record
2/27/2017House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
75 0 0YEA
3/2/2017Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee
4 0 3not eligible / no record
3/2/2017Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee
4 0 3not eligible / no record
3/8/2017Senate/ passed 3rd reading
Senate President
26 0 3not eligible / no record

Bill text

amended version · official source
This document includes House Floor Amendments incorporated into the bill on Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:01 PM by jeyring.
IMPACT FEE AMENDMENTS
GENERAL SESSION
STATE OF UTAH
Chief Sponsor: Walt Brooks
Senate Sponsor: 
 Don L. Ipson
LONG TITLE
General Description:
This bill modifies provisions relating to impact fees.
Highlighted Provisions:
This bill:
▸ modifies a provision relating to spending or encumbering impact fees; and
▸ provides a process for a refund of unspent and unencumbered impact fees.
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
None
Other Special Clauses:
None
Utah Code Sections Affected:
AMENDS:
11-36a-602
, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2011, Chapter 47
11-36a-603
, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2011, Chapter 47
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 1. Section 
11-36a-602
 is amended to read:
11-36a-602.
Expenditure of impact fees.
(1) A local political subdivision may expend impact fees only for a system
improvement:
(a) identified in the impact fee facilities plan; and
(b) for the specific public facility type for which the fee was collected.
(2) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (2)(b), a local political subdivision shall
expend or encumber [
the
] 
an
 impact [
fees
] 
fee collected with respect to a lot:
(i)
 for a permissible use
; and
(ii)
 within six years [
of their receipt.
] 
after the impact fee with respect to that lot is
collected.
(b) A local political subdivision may hold the fees for longer than six years if it
identifies, in writing:
(i) an extraordinary and compelling reason why the fees should be held longer than six
years; and
(ii) an absolute date by which the fees will be expended.
Section 2. Section 
11-36a-603
 is amended to read:
11-36a-603.
Refunds.
(1)
 A local political subdivision shall refund any impact fee paid by a developer, plus
interest earned, when:
[
(1)
] 
(a)
 the developer does not proceed with the development activity and has filed a
written request for a refund;
[
(2)
] 
(b)
 the fee has not been spent or encumbered; and
[
(3)
] 
(c)
 no impact has resulted.
(2) (a) As used in this Subsection (2):
(i) "Affected lot" means the lot
Ĥ→ 
or parcel
 ←Ĥ
with respect to which a local political
49a 
subdivision
collected an impact fee that is subject to a refund under this Subsection (2).
(ii) "Claimant" means:
(A) the original owner; or
(B) another person who, under Subsection (2)(d), submits a timely notice of the
person's valid legal claim to an impact fee refund.
(iii) "Original owner" means the record owner of an affected lot at the time the local
political subdivision collected the impact fee.
(iv) "Unclaimed refund" means an impact fee that:
(A) is subject to refund under this Subsection (2); and
(B) the local political subdivision has not refunded after application of Subsections
(2)(b) and (c).
(b) If an impact fee is not spent or encumbered within the time specified in Subsection
11-36a-602
(2), the local political subdivision shall, subject to Subsection (2)(c):
(i) refund the impact fee to:
(A) the original owner, if the original owner is the sole claimant; or
(B) to the claimants, as the claimants agree, if there are multiple claimants; or
(ii) interplead the impact fee refund to a court of competent jurisdiction for a
determination of the entitlement to the refund, if there are multiple claimants who fail to agree
on how the refund should be paid to the claimants.
(c) If the original owner's last known address is no longer valid at the time a local
political subdivision attempts under Subsection (2)(b) to refund an impact fee to the original
owner, the local political subdivision shall:
(i) post a notice on the local political subdivision's website, stating the local political
subdivision's intent to refund the impact fee and identifying the original owner;
(ii) maintain the notice on the website for a period of one year; and
(iii) disqualify the original owner as a claimant unless the original owner submits a
written request for the refund within one year after the first posting of the notice under
Subsection (2)(c)(i).
(d) (i) In order to be considered as a claimant for an impact fee refund under this
Subsection (2), a person, other than the original owner, shall submit a written notice of the
person's valid legal claim to the impact fee refund.
(ii) A notice under Subsection (2)(d)(i) shall:
(A) explain the person's valid legal claim to the refund; and
(B) be submitted to the local political subdivision no later than 30 days after expiration
of the time specified in Subsection 
11-36a-602
(2) for the impact fee that is the subject of the
refund.
(e) A local political subdivision:
(i) may retain an unclaimed refund; and
(ii) shall expend any unclaimed refund on capital facilities identified in the current
capital facilities plan for the type of public facility for which the impact fee was collected.
Legislative Review Note
Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel