Bill
Post-employment Restrictive Covenant Amendments
- Number
- H.B. 81 First Substitute (2017GS)
- Sponsor
- Rep. Greene, B.
- Final action
- House/ filed 3/9/2017
- Outcome
- Failed / filed without passage
Summary
This bill amends provisions related to post-employment restrictive covenants.
What it does
- This bill:
- outlines the scope of the chapter;
- addresses consideration and termination of employment as they relate to post-employment restrictive covenants;
- modifies remedy provisions;
- restricts the time for bringing an action to enforce post-employment restrictive covenants; and
- makes technical changes.
Every vote on this bill
2/6/2017House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Business and Labor Committee
6 5 3not eligible / no record2/17/2017House/ substituted from # 0 to # 1
House 3rd Reading Calendar for House bills
Voice votenot eligible / no record2/17/2017House/ failed
Clerk of the House
22 49 4YEABill text
introduced version · official source
POST-EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AMENDMENTS GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Brian M. Greene Senate Sponsor: ____________ LONG TITLE General Description: This bill amends provisions related to post-employment restrictive covenants. Highlighted Provisions: This bill: ▸ outlines the scope of the chapter; ▸ addresses consideration and termination of employment as they relate to post-employment restrictive covenants; ▸ modifies remedy provisions; ▸ restricts the time for bringing an action to enforce post-employment restrictive covenants; and ▸ makes technical changes. Money Appropriated in this Bill: None Other Special Clauses: None Utah Code Sections Affected: AMENDS: 34-51-201 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 153 34-51-301 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 153 ENACTS: 34-51-103 , Utah Code Annotated 1953 34-51-302 , Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: Section 1. Section 34-51-103 is enacted to read: 34-51-103. Scope of chapter. Consistent with this chapter, a court of competent jurisdiction determines whether a post-employment restrictive covenant is enforceable. Section 2. Section 34-51-201 is amended to read: 34-51-201. Post-employment restrictive covenants. (1) In addition to any requirements imposed under common law, for a post-employment restrictive covenant entered into on or after May 10, 2016, an employer and an employee may not enter into a post-employment restrictive covenant for a period of more than one year from the day on which the employee is no longer employed by the employer. (2) (a) An employer may not enforce a post-employment restrictive covenant against an employee if: (i) at the time the post-employment restrictive covenant is executed, the employee: (A) is employed by the employer; and (B) does not receive new consideration such as an increase in wages or a promotion; or (ii) without cause, the employer terminates the employment of the employee within one year of the date on which the employee executes the post-employment restrictive covenant. (b) For purposes of Subsection (2)(a)(i), continuation of employment of an existing employee is not consideration for a post-employment restrictive covenant. (3) A post-employment restrictive covenant that violates this section is void. Section 3. Section 34-51-301 is amended to read: 34-51-301. Award of arbitration costs, attorney fees and court costs, and damages. If an employer seeks to enforce a post-employment restrictive covenant through arbitration or by filing a civil action and it is determined that the post-employment restrictive covenant is unenforceable, the employer is liable for [ the employee's ]: (1) the employee's costs associated with arbitration; (2) the employee's attorney fees and court costs; and (3) three times the amount of actual damages. Section 4. Section 34-51-302 is enacted to read: 34-51-302. Timing of action. An employer may not bring an action to enforce a post-employment restrictive covenant after the day on which the time period stated in the post-employment restrictive covenant expires. Legislative Review Note Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel