Bill
Common Area Assessment Amendments
- Number
- H.B. 70 (2017GS)
- Sponsor
- Rep. Froerer, G.
- Final action
- Governor Signed 3/17/2017
- Outcome
- Became law — signed by Gov. Gary R. Herbert
Summary
This bill amends a provision related to assessment of property by a county assessor.
What it does
- This bill:
- allows a county assessor to consider that a property is a common area or facility when assessing the fair market value of the property.
Every vote on this bill
1/24/2017House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
House Revenue and Taxation Committee
9 0 3not eligible / no record1/27/2017House/ passed 3rd reading
Senate Secretary
73 0 2YEA2/3/2017Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
4 0 4not eligible / no record2/3/2017Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee
5 0 3not eligible / no record2/9/2017Senate/ passed 3rd reading
Senate President
26 0 3not eligible / no recordBill text
enrolled version · official source
COMMON AREA ASSESSMENT AMENDMENTS GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Gage Froerer Senate Sponsor: Curtis S. Bramble LONG TITLE General Description: This bill amends a provision related to assessment of property by a county assessor. Highlighted Provisions: This bill: ▸ allows a county assessor to consider that a property is a common area or facility when assessing the fair market value of the property. Money Appropriated in this Bill: None Other Special Clauses: None Utah Code Sections Affected: AMENDS: 59-2-301.1 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2011, Chapter 157 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: Section 1. Section 59-2-301.1 is amended to read: 59-2-301.1. Assessment of property subject to a conservation easement -- Assessment of golf course or hunting club -- Assessment of common areas. (1) In assessing the fair market value of property subject to a conservation easement under Title 57, Chapter 18, Land Conservation Easement Act, a county assessor shall consider factors relating to the property and neighboring property that affect the fair market value of the property being assessed, including: (a) value that transfers to neighboring property because of the presence of a conservation easement on the property being assessed; (b) practical and legal restrictions on the development potential of the property because of the presence of the conservation easement; (c) the absence of neighboring property similarly subject to a conservation easement to provide a basis for comparing values between properties; and (d) any other factor that causes the fair market value of the property to be affected because of the presence of a conservation easement. (2) (a) In assessing the fair market value of a golf course or hunting club, a county assessor shall consider factors relating to the golf course or hunting club and neighboring property that affect the fair market value of the golf course or hunting club, including: (i) value that transfers to neighboring property because of the presence of the golf course or hunting club; (ii) practical and legal restrictions on the development potential of the golf course or hunting club; and (iii) the history of operation of the golf course or hunting club and the likelihood that the present use will continue into the future. (b) The valuation method a county assessor may use in determining the fair market value of a golf course or hunting club includes: (i) the cost approach; (ii) the income capitalization approach; and (iii) the sales comparison approach. (3) In assessing the fair market value of property that is a common area or facility under Title 57, Chapter 8, Condominium Ownership Act, or a common area under Title 57, Chapter 8a, Community Association Act, a county assessor shall consider factors relating to the property and neighboring property that affect the fair market value of the property being assessed, including: (a) value that transfers to neighboring property because the property is a common area or facility; (b) practical and legal restrictions on the development potential of the property because the property is a common area or facility; (c) the absence of neighboring property similarly situated as a common area or facility to provide a basis for comparing values between properties; and (d) any other factor that causes the fair market value of the property to be affected because the property is a common area or facility.